<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrepArmageddon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-76654</link>
		<dc:creator>PrepArmageddon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-76654</guid>
		<description>http://goo.gl/wpILJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://goo.gl/wpILJ" rel="nofollow">http://goo.gl/wpILJ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrepArmageddon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-76652</link>
		<dc:creator>PrepArmageddon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-76652</guid>
		<description>UFO saucer like object spotted today, 12/17/2011. Posting pics on my site.

Here is the URL. VIDEO on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UFO saucer like object spotted today, 12/17/2011. Posting pics on my site.</p>
<p>Here is the URL. VIDEO on the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris wilhelm</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-76410</link>
		<dc:creator>chris wilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 06:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-76410</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris! All well?  I&#039;ve just come across this and thought of you.  http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/11/solar-system-may-have-lost-fifth-giant-planet/?mbid=ob_ppc_science
Best regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris! All well?  I&#8217;ve just come across this and thought of you.  <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/11/solar-system-may-have-lost-fifth-giant-planet/?mbid=ob_ppc_science" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/11/solar-system-may-have-lost-fifth-giant-planet/?mbid=ob_ppc_science</a><br />
Best regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Gregory Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-76322</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Gregory Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 01:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-76322</guid>
		<description>future baby aliens

six hours fast</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>future baby aliens</p>
<p>six hours fast</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Gregory Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-76321</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Gregory Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-76321</guid>
		<description>future baby aliens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>future baby aliens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Gregory Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-76320</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Gregory Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 01:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-76320</guid>
		<description>Evolution dianetics womens science centers

Asian dianetics hypo-media

Pacific Polite Papers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolution dianetics womens science centers</p>
<p>Asian dianetics hypo-media</p>
<p>Pacific Polite Papers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Gregory Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-76319</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Gregory Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 01:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-76319</guid>
		<description>I want to see dianetic websites.

Media.

Dianetic Media.

My moms name is ida.

Mybe idanetic

integral quantum dynamics media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see dianetic websites.</p>
<p>Media.</p>
<p>Dianetic Media.</p>
<p>My moms name is ida.</p>
<p>Mybe idanetic</p>
<p>integral quantum dynamics media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-76016</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-76016</guid>
		<description>It is not that e=mc2 is wrong.  It is the interpretation that since nothing can be “accelerated” past the speed of light that nothing can go faster than the speed of light. Velocity and Acceleration are being confused. Einstein was right to say nothing can be accelerated from rest to faster than  299,792,458 metres in “one” second. The wrong interpretation is to say nothing can have a velocity greater than c. By adding the speed limit we are in effect creating a central rest frame of reference to the universe. And from what I have read I thought that was what Einstein was trying to disprove. With the Lorentz Transformation(LT) we are dealing with only two reference frames. One is at rest. And it deals with a delta of time. If additional LT frames were actually linked together the limit of the acceleration would still hold true between frames. But the velocity is not what is being looked at it is the delta or the acceleration. So my thought experiment would be shooting a rail gun into space. That in turn shoots another rail gun that in turns shots another… Nothing is going to stop the final projectile from exceeding the velocity of light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not that e=mc2 is wrong.  It is the interpretation that since nothing can be “accelerated” past the speed of light that nothing can go faster than the speed of light. Velocity and Acceleration are being confused. Einstein was right to say nothing can be accelerated from rest to faster than  299,792,458 metres in “one” second. The wrong interpretation is to say nothing can have a velocity greater than c. By adding the speed limit we are in effect creating a central rest frame of reference to the universe. And from what I have read I thought that was what Einstein was trying to disprove. With the Lorentz Transformation(LT) we are dealing with only two reference frames. One is at rest. And it deals with a delta of time. If additional LT frames were actually linked together the limit of the acceleration would still hold true between frames. But the velocity is not what is being looked at it is the delta or the acceleration. So my thought experiment would be shooting a rail gun into space. That in turn shoots another rail gun that in turns shots another… Nothing is going to stop the final projectile from exceeding the velocity of light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Dann</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-74714</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Dann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-74714</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for being sceptical but if it has been proved then which scientific journal is the proof in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for being sceptical but if it has been proved then which scientific journal is the proof in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob North</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-74704</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob North</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?page_id=832#comment-74704</guid>
		<description>I have researched physics, paraphysics, metaphysics, and the paranormal for 27 years. I have written a book describing the interconnections of these subjects. Everything is explained in precise and thorough detail. For example it is explained how the phenomena associated with poltergeist activities are produced, including levitation, merging, re-location, space-time anomalies, ansd so on.  These phenomena may be reproduced at will in a controlled lab setting . The title of the book is &#039;A NEW FORM OF ENERGY&#039;; ITS DESCRIPTION; ITS GENERATION; AND ITS APPLICATIONS&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have researched physics, paraphysics, metaphysics, and the paranormal for 27 years. I have written a book describing the interconnections of these subjects. Everything is explained in precise and thorough detail. For example it is explained how the phenomena associated with poltergeist activities are produced, including levitation, merging, re-location, space-time anomalies, ansd so on.  These phenomena may be reproduced at will in a controlled lab setting . The title of the book is &#8216;A NEW FORM OF ENERGY&#8217;; ITS DESCRIPTION; ITS GENERATION; AND ITS APPLICATIONS&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

