<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commercial Spaceflight Ticket Or NASA Ticket To Space And Beyond?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weirdwarp.com/2009/08/commercial-spaceflight-ticket-or-nasa-ticket-to-space-and-beyond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/2009/08/commercial-spaceflight-ticket-or-nasa-ticket-to-space-and-beyond/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Dann</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/2009/08/commercial-spaceflight-ticket-or-nasa-ticket-to-space-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-17976</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Dann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?p=1483#comment-17976</guid>
		<description>Dina, thanks for the compliment and I look forward to your future comments.

Glad you like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dina, thanks for the compliment and I look forward to your future comments.</p>
<p>Glad you like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dina Liesman</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/2009/08/commercial-spaceflight-ticket-or-nasa-ticket-to-space-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-17950</link>
		<dc:creator>Dina Liesman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?p=1483#comment-17950</guid>
		<description>Very interesting blog post thanks for writing it I have added your website to my bookmarks and will be back :) By the way this is a little off topic but I really like your blogs layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting blog post thanks for writing it I have added your website to my bookmarks and will be back <img src='http://www.weirdwarp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  By the way this is a little off topic but I really like your blogs layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrdann</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/2009/08/commercial-spaceflight-ticket-or-nasa-ticket-to-space-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-16702</link>
		<dc:creator>chrdann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?p=1483#comment-16702</guid>
		<description>Looking at it that way is a nice logical way of looking at it, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at it that way is a nice logical way of looking at it, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/2009/08/commercial-spaceflight-ticket-or-nasa-ticket-to-space-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-16689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?p=1483#comment-16689</guid>
		<description>You guys are completely missing a very important point.  It takes over 30 times as much energy to enter orbit (Shuttle ISS) as it does to go straight up and fall straight down (Space Ship One).  And you have to get rid of all that energy coming down which is why the Shuttle needs TPS tiles and Space Ship One doesn&#039;t.  This comparison doesn&#039;t even include the difference in altitude (200 Mi Shuttle ISS) vs 60 Mi (Space Ship One).  Hence the $200k vs $20M price.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_orbital_energy#Earth_orbits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are completely missing a very important point.  It takes over 30 times as much energy to enter orbit (Shuttle ISS) as it does to go straight up and fall straight down (Space Ship One).  And you have to get rid of all that energy coming down which is why the Shuttle needs TPS tiles and Space Ship One doesn&#8217;t.  This comparison doesn&#8217;t even include the difference in altitude (200 Mi Shuttle ISS) vs 60 Mi (Space Ship One).  Hence the $200k vs $20M price.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_orbital_energy#Earth_orbits" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_orbital_energy#Earth_orbits</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derickhartman326</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/2009/08/commercial-spaceflight-ticket-or-nasa-ticket-to-space-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>derickhartman326</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?p=1483#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>Ur templates fit in nicely with the overall feel of ur blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ur templates fit in nicely with the overall feel of ur blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Best Hope For Seeing A Man On The Moon &#38; Some Alternatives &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdwarp.com/2009/08/commercial-spaceflight-ticket-or-nasa-ticket-to-space-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Best Hope For Seeing A Man On The Moon &#38; Some Alternatives &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdwarp.com/?p=1483#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>[...] Commercial spaceflight could be another alternative to the constellation program. At the moment it would just be a way to get passengers, fuel and cargo into orbit. I have already covered the commercial spaceflight opportunities and they don&#8217;t quite reach into space station orbit but the way things are progressing in that area it won&#8217;t be long. It would be quite a big step down for NASA, even if they said they were temporarily relying on commercial rockets. With the cost savings and convenience it may never be possible to go back to their own rockets. Commercial spacecraft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commercial spaceflight could be another alternative to the constellation program. At the moment it would just be a way to get passengers, fuel and cargo into orbit. I have already covered the commercial spaceflight opportunities and they don&#8217;t quite reach into space station orbit but the way things are progressing in that area it won&#8217;t be long. It would be quite a big step down for NASA, even if they said they were temporarily relying on commercial rockets. With the cost savings and convenience it may never be possible to go back to their own rockets. Commercial spacecraft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

